Judge: Town's treatment of pagans may be discrimination

A judge has found that a group of self-described witches may have gotten special treatment from the town of Catskill – and not in a good way.

In a strongly-worded decision issued on Tuesday, Judge George J. Pulver, Jr. of the Greene County Supreme County ruled that the town's denial of a property tax exemption for the Maetreum of Cybele smacks of discrimination.

“Consistent with [the Matreum's] claim that it is being discriminated against, respondents' counsel attempts to hold petitioner to a higher standard than other religious organizations,” Pulver wrote in the decision, a copy of which was obtained by the Watershed Post.

Denying the town's request that he dismiss the case, Pulver wrote that Catskill, through its attorney, made “vague” and “subjective” arguments about the religious practices of the Maetreum in an attempt to justify its decision.

Pulver also ordered Greene County to refrain from foreclosing on the Maetreum's Palenville property until the completion of the lawsuit. The county, which contends that the Maetreum owes $13,835 in unpaid property taxes, sent the group a warning letter about foreclosure last month.

The decision is the biggest victory for the pagans in their years-long battle with Catskill over whether or not they are exempt from property taxes as a religious group.

In 2007, the town's lawyer, Daniel G. Vincelette, advised the town not to grant the group a tax exemption for the Palenville property, which the Maetreum uses as a convent to house several priestesses. Ever since, despite the Maetreum's protests and its status as religious group under state and federal law, Catskill has stuck to its decision. In 2009, the Maetreum filed this lawsuit in the state Supreme Court accusing the town of religious discrimination.

In his most recent argument to the Supreme Court, Vincelette wrote that because religious activity at the Maetreum was limited to “occasional events,” the use of the property was not religious.

Pulver's decision demolished that reasoning.

Vincelette attempted to “strip [the Maetreum] of its religious status … without bothering to set forth any personal expertise or objective basis for his conclusion,” the judge wrote.

The argument that religious events at the Maetreum are too infrequent “has no basis,” he wrote, and is a “subjective standard” that “is so vague that it would wreak havoc if it were generally applied to religious organizations in Greene County.”

The argument seems to be tailor-made to fit the Maetreum, Pulver wrote.

“That [Vincelette's] standards are directed at [the Maetreum] alone and will never be applied to other churches and charitable organizations seems inescapable."

Pulver also criticized Vincelette for mischaracterizing evidence against the Maetreum, including the affidavit of a disaffected ex-resident, which the judge called “misleading.” (That same ex-resident, Pulver noted, allegedly threatened to cut the throat of another resident.)

Although the 14-page decision slams the town of Catskill, the ruling is not an outright victory for the Maetreum. Pulver declined to order the town to grant the Maetreum a tax exemption, writing that the Maetreum had not proven that it deserved one.

2/28/11 Update: This story has been corrected. I initially wrote in several places that Judge Pulver had ordered the case to go to trial, when in fact the issue will remain before him and not go to a jury. (See comments below.) My apologies for the error.

3/2/11 Update: Read the full decision below:

Maetreum of Cybele Summary Judgment Decision

Comments

Just to clarify

It is my understanding that because the first case was filed as Article 78 and the second as Article 7, even if they are conbined, which looks likely, they will be heard in front of the Judge, not  a jury.  The same Judge who just ruled we have been discriminated against.  We will be expected to show the court that we are using our property for religious purposes and are a legitimate religion, both of which will be quite easy for us to do.

Tomorrow we will be filing for our 2011 exemption and this decision removes alleged "illegal use" of our property, the fact that the priestesses live on the property and questioning our legitimacy as a religion as a basis for denial.

error -- it's a non-jury matter

This matter will not be heard by a jury, but by Justice Pulver.  Looks like "case dismissed" to me.  Blessings unto ALL peaceful religions which are based in love.  It is not for us to judge their sincerity! 

Which side?

And to which side are you referring?  Christianity, though started with love in mind, has grown to hate anyone and everything outside of their idea of the truth, THEIR TRUTH.  How many wars were fought in the name of their God?  Almost all of them.  And how many wars were fought in the name of the pagan Gods?  None.  So christianity is neither a religion who follows the love of their founder, nor is peaceful for they constantly rage war against those who don't believe in the way they do.

A motion hearing is not a trial

This story sounds like it's about a motion to dismiss decision, that when denied, routinely leads to a trial. Both bench and jury trials are trials, with bench trials common when issues are of technical fact and law, which most jurors tend to understand even less well than Ms. Reischel's level of illiteracy in legal process.

A linked copy of the decision (rejecting a motion to dismiss for extensively stated cause?) would be nice. This case is being watched by pagans around the country.

A more fundamental problem, any issues of local government prejudices or religious illiteracy aside, is that IRS process and most state and local tax laws violate Constitutional standards. So much religious practice involves 24/7 life with no boundary of religious and secular, or exists by solitary or small group private practices, that it's a fraud to give corporate sects special status.

Motion to dismiss

As the above commenter points correctly surmises, this decision was a motion to dismiss decision. The Town of Catskill has asked Judge Pulver to dismiss the case, and the Maetreum had cross-moved for summary judgment. Pulver denied both requests. My confusion about the next step in the case stems from the fact that Pulver's decision, which I will post on Scribd soon, does not clarify what happens next. (Not that court decisions usually do. Despite the fact that I've been a legal reporter for years, anon, I still find myself amazed and confused by the opacity of the process.)

Decision about pagan tax-exempt status

Does the fact that this home also serves as a "halfway house" for gender change patients enter into the equation? How much of the property is used for religious purposes vs. the home for the patients? And are all of the people waiting for the completion of their "change" followers of the religion of the house?

"half way house"

A significant part of our thealogy is doing charitable works.  We are not a "half way house" in any meaningful sense of the phrase but we do take in charity cases.  In the past, prior to our incorporation, we made ourselves available as a place to recovery from surgery for women who had undergone sexual reassignment surgery, almost no one came to us for that purpose.  Emergency housing is something else and most of the women we take in are non-transsexual.  We currently have a woman living with us escaping a very abusive situation for example.  The only women in the past recovering from surgery were all members of the religion, most who come to us for emergency housing are not.

The entire property is used for religious purposes and under New York tax law, charitable work is not only permitted but actually expected as part of that.

Revenge vs Justice

Hopefully this house of love will be allowed to continue to grow aside from the hatred of the legal tangles.  It seens that this towns Christians are really spiteful - but if this place of worship is closed on the grounds stated above... I wonder how many small town churches around America will have to be stripped of their status under the above precedents?

L&l